The double redaction of the Deuteronomistic history
Martin Noth argued that in the books of Joshua-Kings could be seen the work of a single, purposeful author or historian-a hypothesis which, although close to becoming one of those rare 'assured results of critical scholarship', has recently encountered criticism. Nelson observes that Noth&...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Libro electrónico |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Sheffield :
JSOT Press, Dept. of Biblical Studies, University of Sheffield
1981.
|
| Colección: | EBSCO Academic eBook Collection Complete.
Journal for the study of the Old Testament. Supplement series ; 18. |
| Acceso en línea: | Conectar con la versión electrónica |
| Ver en Universidad de Navarra: | https://innopac.unav.es/record=b31554787*spi |
| Sumario: | Martin Noth argued that in the books of Joshua-Kings could be seen the work of a single, purposeful author or historian-a hypothesis which, although close to becoming one of those rare 'assured results of critical scholarship', has recently encountered criticism. Nelson observes that Noth's historian has a 'disturbing tendency to fall apart in the hands of those who work with him'. In this comprehensive study of the question, he attempts to put on a solid critical foundation the increasingly popular theory that the Deutoronomistic History is a product of a two-stage literary process. |
|---|---|
| Notas: | Originally presented as the author's thesis (Th. D.--Union Theological Seminary, Richmond, Va., 1973). |
| Descripción Física: | 185 p. |
| Formato: | Forma de acceso: World Wide Web. |
| Bibliografía: | Incluye referencias bibliográficas (p. 151-166) e índice. |
| ISBN: | 9780567270191 |
