Citizens, courts, and confirmations positivity theory and the judgments of the American people
In recent years the American public has witnessed several hard-fought battles over nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court. In these heated confirmation fights, candidates' legal and political philosophies have been subject to intense scrutiny and debate. Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations examines...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Otros Autores: | |
Formato: | Libro electrónico |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Princeton, N.J. :
Princeton University Press
c2009.
|
Colección: | EBSCO Academic eBook Collection Complete.
|
Acceso en línea: | Conectar con la versión electrónica |
Ver en Universidad de Navarra: | https://innopac.unav.es/record=b3127819x*spi |
Sumario: | In recent years the American public has witnessed several hard-fought battles over nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court. In these heated confirmation fights, candidates' legal and political philosophies have been subject to intense scrutiny and debate. Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations examines one such fight--over the nomination of Samuel Alito--to discover how and why people formed opinions about the nominee, and to determine how the confirmation process shaped perceptions of the Supreme Court's legitimacy. Drawing on a nationally representative survey, James Gibson and Gregory Caldeira use. |
---|---|
Descripción Física: | xiv, 178 p. : il |
Formato: | Forma de acceso: World Wide Web. |
Bibliografía: | Incluye referencias bibliográficas (p. [163]-174) e índice. |
ISBN: | 9781400830602 |