Grammar and complexity language at the intersection of competence and performance
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Libro electrónico |
Idioma: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Oxford :
Oxford University Press
2013.
|
Edición: | 1st ed |
Colección: | EBSCO Academic eBook Collection Complete.
Oxford linguistics. |
Acceso en línea: | Conectar con la versión electrónica |
Ver en Universidad de Navarra: | https://innopac.unav.es/record=b40508304*spi |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- pt. I Theoretical background
- 1. Varieties of grammatical complexity
- 1.1. Tolerating complexity, or Squinting at Dali's Lincoln
- 1.1.1. Resolution
- 1.1.2. Core and periphery
- 1.1.3. On explanation in linguistics: beyond the core and the periphery
- 1.2. The logic of complexity
- 1.3. Formal complexity
- competence
- 1.3.1. Markedness
- 1.3.2. Derivational economy
- 1.3.3. Syntactic complexity
- 1.4. Processing complexity
- 1.5. Other notions of complexity
- 1.5.1. Surprisal
- 1.5.2. Optimality theory
- 2. The architecture of constructions
- 2.1. Constructions
- 2.2. Correspondences
- 2.2.1. Representing constructions
- 2.2.2. VP
- 2.2.3. Meaning
- 2.3. Constructional complexity
- 2.3.1. Regularities and idiosyncrasies in the constructional lexicon
- 2.3.2. Coverage
- 2.3.3. Strain
- pt. II English constructions
- 3. Isolating constructional complexity: two case studies
- 3.1. English relatives
- 3.1.1. Inheritance and complexity.
- 3.1.2. Relatives as constructions
- Sag (1997)
- 3.1.3. Simplifying the description
- 3.1.4. Relative correspondences
- 3.1.5. Appositive and free relatives
- 3.1.6. Summary
- 3.2. Focus inversion
- 3.2.1. Inversion
- 3.2.2.Comparative inversion
- 3.2.3. The subject is l̀ow'
- 3.2.4. Focus inversion as a construction
- 3.2.5. More focus inversion constructions
- 3.2.6. Conclusions
- 4. Constructions and the notion p̀ossible human language'
- 4.1. Sluice-stranding
- 4.1.1. Correspondences for questions
- 4.1.2. Interpreting sluicing
- 4.2.Comparative correlatives
- 4.3. Concessives
- 4.4. Imperatives
- 4.5. Not-topics (not in my car (you won't))
- 4.6. Summary
- pt. III Processing complexity and grammar
- 5. Reflexes of processing complexity
- 5.1. Universals
- 5.2. Where do universals live?
- 5.3. Islands
- 5.3.1.Complexity factors
- 5.3.2. Grammatical constraint violations
- 5.3.3.Computing correspondences
- 5.4. Parasitic gaps.
- 5.4.1. Parasitic gap constructions
- 5.4.2.Complexity factors in parasitic gaps
- 5.4.3. Some impossible parasitic gaps
- 5.4.4. Summary: processing gaps
- 5.5.Complex ellipsis
- 5.6. Summary
- pt. IV Acquisition, change, and variation
- 6. Explaining complexity: the learner in the network
- 6.1. The paradox of complexity
- 6.2. Growing complexity
- 6.2.1. Infinitival relatives
- 6.2.2. Preposition-stranding
- 6.3. Maintaining complexity
- 6.3.1. Learning constructions
- 6.3.2. Constructions in contact: viruses in the body linguistic
- 6.4. Conclusions and perspectives
- 7. Constructional complexity and change
- 7.1. Change as explanation
- 7.2. Derivations
- 7.2.1. Affix hopping
- 7.2.2. The shift to structure: I0
- 7.3. English constructions
- 7.3.1. Some core constructions
- 7.3.2. Ordering the correspondences
- 7.3.3. Constructional domains
- 7.3.4.do-support
- 7.4. Tracing the changes
- 7.4.1. Periphrastic do.
- 7.4.2. Growth of English do-support
- 7.4.3. Transition to SAI
- 7.5. Summary
- 8. Integrating constructions, complexity, and change
- 8.1. CWG verb clusters
- 8.2. Derivational accounts
- 8.3. Optimality accounts
- 8.4.A constructional account
- 8.5. Two biases
- 8.6. Clusters in the network
- 8.7. Summary.