Argumentation in political deliberation
Dialectical approaches traditionally conceptualize argumentation as a discussion in which two parties debate on "two sides of an issue" (pro and con). However, many political issues engender multiple positions. This is clear in multi-party online deliberations in which often an array of co...
| Otros Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Libro electrónico |
| Idioma: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Philadelphia, PA :
John Benjamins Publishing Company
[2015]
|
| Colección: | EBSCO Academic eBook Collection Complete.
Benjamins current topics ; 76. |
| Acceso en línea: | Conectar con la versión electrónica |
| Ver en Universidad de Navarra: | https://innopac.unav.es/record=b39261761*spi |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Argumentation in Political Deliberation; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Argumentation in political deliberation; 1. Argumentation theory and political deliberation; 2. Overview of the volume; Acknowledgements; References; Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse in political deliberation; 1. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse; 2. Conventionalization of communicative practices in communicative activity types; 3. Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering; 4. Pragma-dialectical research of argumentative discourse in the political domain.
- The place of counter discourse in two methods of public deliberation1. Introduction; 2. Two methods of public deliberation; 2.1 Consensus conference; French consensus conference on nanotechnology; 2.2 Public hearing; The public hearing on nanotechnology; 2.3 Public participation vs. public communication types of deliberation; 3. Defining public deliberation within argumentation studies; 4. Counter discourse in the two methods of public deliberation; 4.1 Counter discourse in the consensus conference; 4.2 Counter discourse in the public hearing; 5. Concluding remarks; Acknowledgements.
- 3. Political online forums as argumentative communities4. Research design; The online forum Climategate.nl; Data selection; Method of analysis; 5. Analysis; Fragment A: 8-12 December 2009; Fragment B: 17 January-3 February 2010; Fragment C: 14-21 June 2010; Fragment D: 18-21 April 2011; Fragment E: 27 April-2 May 2011; 6. Conclusion; Acknowledgements; References; Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation; 1. Introduction; 2. Bin Laden is dead and what now; 3. Participants in online deliberation; 4. Sides, positions, cases, and parties in argumentation; 5. Conclusion.
