Rationality concepts in environmental valuation

Survey based valuation techniques like the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) rely particularly on the premise of respondents’ rationality when answering willingness to pay (WTP) questions. Results of CVM surveys have repeatedly put this fundamental assumption into question. This study adopts a more...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Otros Autores: Frör, Oliver, author (author)
Formato: Libro electrónico
Idioma:Inglés
Publicado: Bern Peter Lang International Academic Publishing Group 2018
Frankfurt am Main, Germany : [2007]
Frankfurt am Main, Germany : [2018]
Edición:1st ed
Colección:Hohenheimer volkswirtschaftliche Schriften ; Band 58.
Materias:
Ver en Biblioteca Universitat Ramon Llull:https://discovery.url.edu/permalink/34CSUC_URL/1im36ta/alma991009424528606719
Tabla de Contenidos:
  • Cover
  • i List of Figures
  • ii List of Tables
  • iii List of Abbreviations
  • 1 Introduction
  • 1.1 Motivation and scope
  • 1.2 Further outline of the study
  • 2 Environmental valuation
  • 2.1 Theory and practice of environmental valuation
  • 2.1.1 Environmental valuation - why?
  • 2.1.2 Environmental valuation and benefit-cost analysis in neoclassical economics
  • 2.1.3 Methods of environmental valuation
  • 2.1.3.1 Indirect methods
  • 2.1.3.2 Direct methods
  • 2.1.4 Statistical estimation models for the CVM
  • 2.2 Rationality problems in environmental valuation
  • 2.2.1 Biases in Contingent Valuation
  • 2.2.2 Rationality problems due to preference uncertainty
  • 2.3 Summary
  • 3 Rationality in economics
  • 3.1 Outline of the chapter
  • 3.2 Rationality concepts in economics an overview
  • 3.2.1 What is rationality?
  • 3.2.2 Extensions of the neoclassical rationality concept
  • 3.3 Bounded rationality
  • 3.3.1 The emergence of bounded rationality in the literature
  • 3.3.2 Evidence of bounded rationality in economics and the social sciences
  • 3.3.3 The psychological foundations of bounded rationality in environmental valuation
  • 3.3.3.1 Why deal with psychology?
  • 3.3.3.2 Cognitive psychology and its relation to the discipline of psychology
  • 3.3.3.3 Fundamentals of cognitive psychology
  • 3.3.4 Psychological models of reasoning: dual-process approaches
  • 3.3.4.1 The concept of dual-process approaches
  • 3.3.4.2 Specific model approaches of dual-processes in the context of environmental valuation
  • 3.4 Summary
  • 4 Bounded rationality in environmental valuation
  • 4.1 Review and outline of the chapter
  • 4.2 Theoretical considerations
  • 4.2.1 Dealing with preference uncertainty: a fuzzy approach
  • 4.2.1.1 Fuzzy logic and fuzzy preferences
  • 4.2.1.2 Is it possible to assess fuzzy preferences regarding the environment?.
  • 4.2.2 Considering bounded rationality in environmental valuation
  • 4.2.2.1 What constitutes rationality in environmental valuation? The normative view
  • 4.2.2.2 Why is bounded rationality a problem in environmental valuation?
  • 4.2.2.3 Research questions and hypotheses
  • 4.3 Development of empirical instruments for analyzing bounded rationality in CVM
  • 4.3.1 A measure for individual differences in decision making: the rational experiential inventory (REI)
  • 4.3.2 Adaptation of the REI to the context of the CVM
  • 4.4 An empirical example
  • 4.4.1 Background of the empirical research project: The Uplands Program
  • 4.4.2 General research ideas and hypotheses of the subproject in northern Thailand
  • 4.4.2.1 Problem definition
  • 4.4.2.2 The empirical design
  • 4.4.2.3 The measurement scales of bounded rationality in northern Thailand - research implementation in the survey design
  • 4.4.2.4 Practical implementation of the survey
  • 4.4.3 Empirical results of the project
  • 4.4.3.1 Socio-economic and demographic characteristics of the respondent population
  • 4.4.3.2 Estimates of willingness-to-pay for the tap water improvement program
  • 4.4.3.3 Determinants of willingness-to-pay
  • 4.4.3.4 The measurement scales of bounded rationality
  • 4.4.3.5 Characteristics of the task independent and task dependent types
  • 4.4.3.6 Bounded rationality and WTP
  • 4.4.3.7 Detection of procedural biases and their relation to the measures of cognitive type
  • 4.5 Discussion and implications of the empirical results of the study
  • 5 Summary and conclusions
  • 6 References
  • 7 Appendix
  • 7.1 Survey questionnaire
  • 7.2 Correlations of socio-economic and attitudinal variables with TIF and TDF
  • 7.2.1 Task independent factors
  • 7.2.2 Task dependent factors.